Multiracialist populism is just another variation of controlled opposition.
Populist should aim for the elite using these astroturf poseurs as decoy agents infiltrating all sides.

That doesn’t mean they are “pro-White.”

I didn’t say they were pro-White.

But the record shows that the attempt to win over minority groups in massive proportions has been a damp squib and is likely to remain so as far as the eye can see.

Look. I don’t know what you’re talking about here. Do you not understand what happened in November? The Democrats thought they could continue to whore themselves out to the multinational corporatocracy while winning elections by whipping up hysterical fear and hatred of Joe and Jane Sixpack. The Hispanics appear to be smarter than any of us gave them credit for. The good news is that we don’t have to pander to them on immigration, so the Republicans no longer have any excuse.

It’s unfortunate that Whites won’t have uncompromised political representation, but then if a substantial number of Hispanics will vote for a Republican party that supports reasonable pro-White policies, the Left can hardly use demographic triumphalism to intimidate the Republicans …

Haven’t we already been through this “Hispanics are natural conservatives” in the Bush II era? Hispanics (who, as someone usually points out, include a wide range of racial characteristics and national origins) may be conservative on issues that matter to them. That doesn’t mean they are “pro-White.”

If Hispanics are temporarily allied with whites in particular categories like immigration — perhaps they’re against foreign colonization from non-Hispanic countries — well and good. We can welcome their support, limited though it may be. But the record shows that the attempt to win over minority groups in massive proportions has been a damp squib and is likely to remain so as far as the eye can see.

Hispanics are the most plausible allies for Whites, and I mean allies only, because we can’t possibly agree on everything, especially immigration. Unfortunately, we have let ourselves slip to the point where we will be forced to make such alliances.

No doubt about it. I can see a functional future for a supermajority White/Hispanic America. Indeed, I suspect this is the chief concern of the Plutocracy right now. It’s unfortunate that Whites won’t have uncompromised political representation, but then if a substantial number of Hispanics will vote for a Republican party that supports reasonable pro-White policies, the Left can hardly use demographic triumphalism to intimidate the Republicans into continual pandering to Hispanics at the expense of Whites, even on immigration.

Whites and Hispanics have enough in common culturally, historically, and even genetically to form an effective alliance against the money power. An immigration moratorium would go a long way to breaking old country ties and solidifying American identity and loyalty among Hispanics. A return to law and order, likely to be popular among Hispanics, would remove the dregs from the gene pool and make affordable neighborhoods more liveable.

Politics has been defined by a coalition of the fringes against the White majority for decades now. I see no reason why Whites couldn’t turn the tables and lead a populist coalition against the elites that now define the Democratic party. We don’t even need all that many Hispanics, a few percentage points’ growth each election cycle would do nicely. This possibility is, I believe keeping certain people up at night and haunting their dreams. Their defense will be to attempt an H1B tsunami. They must not succeed.

an emergent multiracial coalition of working-class voters has great electoral power.

For this reason the deep state throws everything it has against the successful formation of such a coalition, just as it has made long obsolete Third Party political candidacies. Divide and conquer is the sharpest tool of tyranny, expanding the natural fault lines between ethnic and economic rivals. MLK (and Malcolm X) attracted an assassin’s attention only after he expanded the civil rights struggle to include poor whites as well as blacks.

I suspect Trump won in 2024 for the same reason Lincoln won in 1860, not that people so much supported the GOP platform, but because the electorate was appalled by the staggering corruption of the Democratic Party.

Educated people tend to be liberals – you have said a mouthful there, brother. Those of us who value the life of the mind carry memories of being bullied by what we think of as the knuckle-dragging element in our dear old school days. Sorry, it is still an effort to respect people who take such transparent BS as patriotism, religion, and sports seriously, as if they were real things and not oligarchy’s carefully constructed control mechanisms. Tell you what, the top tenth of the one percent, who make all the decisions globally, hate and fear their loyal plebeians just as much as they abhor people who think rationally rather than react emotionally. To some of us it seems that the True Believer crowd is so used to being pissed on that they want to literally kill those of us who try to point out to them that rain isn’t naturally hot and yellow.

“Gentile whites”? Jews are not white. Just say whites.

Hispanics are the most plausible allies for Whites, and I mean allies only, because we can’t possibly agree on everything, especially immigration. Unfortunately, we have let ourselves slip to the point where we will be forced to make such alliances.

Author here, I agree with your assessment. The entirety of the “multiracial populist coalition” worldview is bereft of historical accuracy and any semblance of originality. I tried to keep the subject matter of the review limited to the content of the book to elucidate all of the the internal contradictions and general intellectual poverty behind the author’s ideas.

That being said, I am hoping to expand on these ideas in future essays, hopefully with better source material to draw from. Appreciate your feedback, as this is my first foray into writing about politics. God speed to you as well.

Who cares about the Republicans. They are crooks. Just like the Democrats. Your elephant is showing.

Our host Ron Unz has provided, in the “controversial” HTML books, Erectus Walks Amongst Us. Very few “normies”, and unfortunately even a great many TUR readers, will be unwilling or unable to accept the arguments presented because those arguments conflict with the notion of an invisible god magically and all-of-a-sudden making an Earthful of Homo sapiens. But the book does provide compelling evidence which helps explain our current state of affairs – from fields including, but not limited to, anthropology, chemistry, and history. The nonsense of projecting what “college-educated” (a now meaningless term) sub-Saharan Africans will do in the future is as pointless as giving chimps unlimited quantities of food and believing that they will then build the Parthenon.

Not sure what to make of this hodgepodge of drivel (not the author´s fault) …
– It was of course Griggs vs. Duke Power that forced employers to demand
college degrees as a proxy for the ability to read and write; 1950 US public education
was the envy of the world – then came Brown vs. Education; KILL IT.
Like it or not, no society needs more than 15% university graduates; for the US,
more like 10%; introduce either a gaokao or the German numerus clausus
(oh, and in the name of all that is holy kill “university” sports).
– The only other thing of use was the graph on polarization; put simply, it means
that only Whites (and, for some dark and bloody reason, Natives) vote on
(variable-quality) “principles”, everybody else votes gibs; for the electioneer
(Mr. Ruffini) this means it is pointless to woo Whites as they won´t be swayed anyway
(Orange Man ignored that truism, but that proves nothing)
– The two-party sytem is a sickness but it is what the Founders intended; “Israel”
achieves the same Rule by 3% with “multiparty”.
True is as much as the Stupid Party is on the way of becoming the new Workers´.
God speed.