As a citizen religiologist, I don't take seriously the camp against "cults/sects" (used as a term of abuse against unpopular religious movements), because for one thing, inter alia, the term "criminal religious movement" is a more accurate and useful category than the category "cults/sects" could ever be. Couldn't we agree, besides, that ostracizing persons of certain religious communities (henotheistic or otherwise) and having the reflexive urge to denigrate such people is not generally a sign of good character?
Furthermore, what would you rather do and where would you rather be, whether online or offline?
It feels disappointing, on those grounds, that Bitter Wintergot designated as "generally unreliable" - as if doing an apologia for one new religious movement or more were politically incorrect; such a designation has to be nothing less than pseudovirtuously unfair.
.svg){kind=small}
