What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices

, , , , &
Cognition 123 (3):434-441 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 141,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On the alleged connection between moral evil and human freedom.Joel Thomas Tierno - 2001 - Sophia 40 (2):1-6.
Why use real and hypothetical payoffs?Anton Kühberger - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):419-420.
Compulsory ethics education and the cognitive moral development of salespeople: A quasi-experimental assessment. [REVIEW]George Izzo - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):223 - 241.
The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments.Susanne Bobzien - 1997 - Phronesis 42 (3):299-312.
About emotional intelligence and moral decisions.Pablo Fernandez-Berrocal & Natalio Extremera - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):548-549.
Hypothetical consent and moral force.Daniel Brudney - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (3):235-270.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
179 (#227,817)

6 months
51 (#164,854)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Photo of David Evans
David Evans
Open University (UK)

Citations of this work

View all 47 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

View all 9 references / Add more references