Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge [Book Review]

International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):107-108 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00190365

DOI

10.5840/ipq200444168

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 141,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Good knowledge, bad knowledge: on two dogmas of epistemology.Stephen Hetherington - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Glamorous self knowledge – what's it good for?Andreas Kemmerling - unknown
Some Major Strands of Theodicy.Richard Swinburne - 1996 - In The Evidential Argument From Evil. Indiana Univ Pr. pp. 30-48.
Seeking the Truth and Taking Care for Common Goods – Plato on Expertise and Recognizing Experts.Jörg Hardy - 2010 - Episteme 7 (1):7-22.
Does Philosophy Betray Both Reason and Humanity?Nicholas Maxwell - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 62 (62):17-18.
The nature of ability and the purpose of knowledge.John Greco - 2007 - Philosophical Issues 17 (1):57–69.
The Distinction between Knowledge-That and Knowledge-How.Huiming Ren - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (4):857-875.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
186 (#218,321)

6 months
28 (#323,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Photo of Bruce Brower
Bruce Brower
Tulane University

Citations of this work

Epistemic Gradualism Versus Epistemic Absolutism.Changsheng Lai - 2021 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (1):186-207.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references