Wikipedia:Artificial intelligence resources
This is a directory related to artificial intelligence (AI) in various administrative namespaces including; protocols, essays, collaboration groups, maintenance resources, discussions and news.
For other useful directories and indexes, see Wikipedia:Directories and indexes.
Protocols and information
[edit]Policies
[edit]- AI usage
- WP:Editing policy § Artificial intelligence additions - (WP:EPAI) – the use of AI writing tools such as large language models (LLMs) for the creation or rewriting of articles, or their usage to generate images, sources or comments, save for a few exceptions, is generally prohibited (as outlined by the linked pages below)
- Images
- WP:Biographies of living persons § AI generated images - (WP:AIIMGBLP) – AI-generated images should not be used to depict subjects of BLPs
- WP:Image use policy § AI-generated images - (WP:AIIMAGES) – most images wholly generated by AI should not be used in mainspace
- Deletion
- WP:Speedy deletion § G15 - (WP:G15) – for a page that exhibits signs that it was generated by an LLM with no human review
Guidelines
[edit]- Article content
- WP:Writing articles with large language models - (WP:LLM) – the use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is largely prohibited
- WP:LLM-assisted translation - (WP:LLMT) – about machine translation tools that includes LLMs
- Images
- WP:Manual of Style/Images § AI upscaling - (MOS:AIUPSCALE) – AI-upscaling should not be used to increase the resolution of images
- Sources
- WP:Reliable sources § Sources produced by machine learning - (WP:RSML) – sources produced by LLMs are generally unreliable
- Talk pages
- WP:Talk page guidelines § LLM - (WP:AITALK) – about striking or collapsing comments that are generated by AI-technology
- Behavioral
- WP:Disruptive editing § Persistent LLM use - (WP:LLMDISRUPT) – repeated use of LLMs to generate content is considered disruptive
- Deletion
- WP:Presumptive removal of AI-generated content - (WP:LLMPRV) – AI generated contributions to pages may be reversed, and single-contributor pages may be deleted
Noticeboard
[edit]- WP:AI noticeboard - (WP:AINB) – for discussing persistent issues of AI misuse
Info pages
[edit]- WP:Artificial intelligence – an overview of AI related to Wikipedia's administration and governance
- WP:Large language models – an overview of LLMs usage throughout Wikipedia
- WP:Identifying LLM unblock requests – a list of writing and formatting conventions typical of AI chatbots
- WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources § Large language models – sources generated by LLMs are unreliable
- WP:Translation § Machine translation – machine translation tools should be used with extreme caution
Essays
[edit]- WP:AI agents and the bot policy – how use of AI may be subject to the bot policy
- WP:Clean up the AI before deleting – pages containing suspected AI content can be cleaned over deletion
- WP:Do not lie about AI – lying about the use of AI or LLMs will not end well
- WP:Drafts § Reasons to move an article to draftspace – an alternative to deletion
- WP:Guide to appealing blocks § Composing your request to be unblocked – unblock requests generated by LLMs are likely to be rejected
- WP:Help, I've been accused of AI! – tell the truth if you used AI
- WP:Large language models and copyright – careful LLMs often generate material that violates copyright
- WP:LLM use disclosure – LLM use disclosure is highly recommended
- WP:LLMs are bad search engines – you should never use LLMs to research topics or find sources
- WP:Marketing buzzspeak and AI – outputs written by LLMs may contain buzzspeak
- WP:Responsibly using large language models – LLMs can serve purposes outside of content generation
- WP:Sharing AI chat sessions – how one can generate a shareable link for their AI chat sessions
- WP:Signs of AI writing – a list of writing and formatting conventions typical of AI chatbots
- WP:Signs of AI-generated comments – a list of writing and formatting conventions typical of comments written by users of AI chatbots
- WP:The LLM-written ANI report – all of the general considerations regarding LLM use in discussions apply to ANI
- WP:Wikipedia is written by humans, for humans – Wikipedia is a human-driven endeavor, created, edited, and administered by humans, for humans
- WP:Yes, that does violate the AI guidelines – explanations of why common excuses for AI use still violate WP:NOLLM, a la WP:YESPROMO
- WP:Yes, you have to follow NOLLM – being a "guideline" and not a "policy" does not make WP:NOLLM optional
- Humorous
Proposals
[edit]Draft(s)
[edit]Failed
[edit]WikiProjects
[edit]WikiProjects are open groups of editors. New participants are welcome!
- WP:WikiProject AI Cleanup – to combat the problem of AI-generated content
- WP:WikiProject AI Cleanup/Guide – a guide to finding and fixing AI-generated content
- WP:WikiProject AI Tools – for implementing constructive uses of LLMs and other AI models as editing tools
- WP:WikiProject Artificial Intelligence – on improving articles related to the field of AI
- WP:WikiProject Women in Red/AI Ethics – list of women in AI ethics who either have no page or need better coverage
Maintenance
[edit]Chatbots (and the large language models that power them) have become very popular; they can often output material much faster than humans can. Unfortunately, they cannot write as well as humans (yet), and their output is prone to hallucinations, false citations, and other errors. This has created a major cleanup burden at Wikipedia, as many editors (especially new ones) try their hand at using artificial intelligence to edit Wikipedia. You can help by identifying AI-written text, removing unsourced or inaccurate claims, and by identifying AI-generated images. For more information, see our AI Cleanup Guide.
Templates
[edit]- For content:
- {{AI-generated}} (Maintenance banner)
- {{AI-generated inline}} (Inline tag)
- {{AI-generated span}} (Inline tag)
- For sources:
- {{AI-generated source?}} (Inline tag)
- {{AI-retrieved source}} (Inline tag)
- {{Upscaled images}} (Maintenance banner)
- {{Upscaled inline}} (Inline tag)
- {{Uw-ai1}}, {{Uw-ai2}}, {{Uw-ai3}}, {{Uw-ai4}}
- (Warnings for article content)
- {{Uw-aitalk1}}, {{Uw-aitalk2}}, {{Uw-aitalk3}}, {{Uw-aitalk4}}
- (Warnings for discussion comments)
- {{Welcome-LLM}} (Welcome with warning)
- {{Uw-create-ai1}}, {{Uw-create-ai2}} (Creation warning)
- {{AfC submission|D|ai}} (Declining drafts)
- {{AfC decline|reason=ai}} (Notifying users)
- {{Db-g15}} (Speedy deletion nomination)
- {{Db-llm-notice|PageName}} (Notifying users)
- {{Prod llm}} (Proposed deletion nomination)
- {{Collapse AI top}} (Talk page)
- {{AINB-notice}} (Notifying users of noticeboard discussion)
- {{AINB talk notice}} (Reminding users that noticeboard exists)
- {{Uw-llmblock}} (Block notice)
- {{Looks AI-generated}}, {{MegaphoneAI}}
- (Inline comment-level icons)
Tracking
[edit]- Edit filters
- AI-generated text
- Pages tagged with
{{AI-generated}}or{{AI-generated inline}}
| To display all subcategories click on the "►": |
|---|
- AI-generated sources
- Pages tagged with
{{AI-generated source?}}or{{AI-retrieved source}}
| To display all subcategories click on the "►": |
|---|
- AI-upscaled images
- Pages tagged with
{{Upscaled images}}or{{Upscaled inline}}
| To display all subcategories click on the "►": |
|---|
- Speedy deletions due to LLM content
- Pages tagged with {{Db-g15}}
| To display all subcategories click on the "►": |
|---|
- Draft declined due to LLM content
| To display all subcategories click on the "►": |
|---|
Discussions
[edit]| AI article alerts |
|---|
|
Did you know
Articles for deletion
Proposed deletions
Good article nominees
Requested moves
Articles to be split
Articles for creation
|
| Suspected AI-generated articles | ||
|---|---|---|
|
AI slop. TNT. msk 00:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
I'm not finding support for the idea that this topic is notable -- there are certainly books written in similar molds, but scholars do not appear to have treated all of them from 1840 to 2019 as a single category worthy of analysis. Still, it's a bit of a synthfest and it certainly feels like it should be a notable topic, so I may be/would be happily proven wrong (even if we have to do some WP:TNT on the article as it stands). Otherwise, I'd like to see a merge of what's salvageable to Russian imperialism and Russian literature. Ed [talk] [OMT] 16:00, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
This topic has no obvious inherent notability, and its definition appears to be defined by us, not reliable sources. It's a bit of a WP:REFBOMB situation. Many of the novels are also self-categorized by us rather than reliable sources doing that work. Some of the material could be merged to Yellow Peril. Ed [talk] [OMT] 15:41, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Russia taking over Europe does indeed appear in many fictional books, but there is no indication that it is notable and/or that academics have examined it as such. Ed [talk] [OMT] 15:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: Due to AI use, the article appears to contain multiple verification fails and a hallucinated URL (which I tagged). I used Google Translate to translate the sources. Ca talk to me! 09:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
The formatting and structure indicates this might have been written with WP:LLM AI. For instance, there are many sections uncited and bolded sub-headings that do not meat MOS The content itself is also very fluffery-adjacent and likely is WP:UNDUE coverage. Beyond that, it also likely does not meet WP:NEVENT as the coverage is recent and routine even if covered in diverse sources EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 01:21, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
This article is mostly a copy and paste from an WP:LLM generated summary of this 1980s game. LLM or not, it fails WP:GNG due to most of the sources being non-notable gaming forums. In addition, the user who made this has made other articles that are LLM copy-pastes that are not notable. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 22:11, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Appears notable neither as an online marketplace nor as a gaming / eSports brand; the sources do not contain the requisite significant, independent coverage. The only source with nontrivial coverage, Info Argentum, is blatantly promotional. ~ A412 talk! 20:06, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
I propose merging to Penetration test because automated and semi-automated approaches are a routine part of penetration testing. These approaches make more sense to discuss in context with the practice as a whole. Also, this article is an orphan (no other articles link to it), and it has substantial signs of being written with an LLM (see WP:AISIGNS), such as the whole paragraph with "To avoid implying consensus, this article describes". Better to scrap this article and merge anything useful and verified into the main article, instead of trying to rewrite it. Dreamyshade (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
Bringing this here for discussion rather than unilaterally re-draftifying since the AfD was sparsely attended and nom was subsequently blocked. That said, this has many WP:AISIGNS and not enough sourcing to meet N:CORP. If it does close as draftify, suggest move protection to enforce AfC. Star Mississippi 00:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
The content of this article is about pulmonary nodules in elephants. Pulmonary nodules occur in other species, including humans. This either needs to be moved to pulmonary nodules in elephants, completely rewritten to cover to the topic of pulmonary nodules in general, or possibly deleted if there is no consensus to move to the existing article to pulmonary nodules in elephants. Plantdrew (talk) 03:47, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
The article is about a future event. Fails WP:GNG or WP:NEVENT. Most of the sources are announcements based on information provided by organizers. The page is premature too, a lot of elaboration on planned activities and expected features are mentioned. Wikipicked (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:01, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
This is a residential condominium in Hawai'i. Its designer may be notable but notability is not inherited. An unsourced section says that it has appeared in movies and TV shows, but I'm not convinced that is notable under WP:NBUILD. A bit part in a movie doesn't make an actor notable, I don't see why it would make a building notable. I don't see significant coverage of its architecture or history. Article is also partly LLM (and heavily edited by sockpuppets), so the current text has to go; before trying to stubify, though, I'd like to know if there's anything here to save. M kuhner (talk) 19:11, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the article's undeletion for any reason. ✗plicit 23:17, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
One of many pages of academics at the Lodz University of Technology recently created directly in main by a novice editor who appears to be following a template. Associate professor in mechanical engineering with a h-factor of 30 and ~2.9K cites, too low for NPROF. Page has awards, but they are all junior or minor. At the minimum COI, I have asked page creator about UPE, no response as yet. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:31, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
One of many pages of academics at Łódź University of Technology recently created directly in main. With a Scopus h-factor of 34 & 3.4K cites the case for NPROF is weak. No awards and most of the page is promo that would be removed if the page is retained. Like other pages from the same editor, probable COI and possible UPE. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:11, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
In addition to the LLM issues, there are no sources present that help this pass WP:NBOOK. There are questionably reliable interviews and nothing else; interviews can be helpful to build out an article but do not help notability unless there is substantial independent content in the piece, which is not the case here. A search found no other sources that are all 3 of independent, significant coverage, and reliable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:45, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Author has admitted to LLM use (see WP:AINB § User:Global Donald) and article has clear WP:AISIGNS. LLMPROD repeatedly contested but I don't think the LLM text has been adequately cleaned up. As a separate issue, the vast majority of citations appear to be WP:CORPTRIV and I'm not convinced that the subject is notable. M kuhner (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NCORP - coverage is largely WP:CORPTRIV such as funding and valuations. Lacks WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. ScalarFactor (talk) 01:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Another AI-generated "X in Y" article (or in this case, "X and Y"). Fails WP:NOLLM and WP:ESSAY, likely containing WP:OR as well. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:26, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
I propose redirecting to Espérance Sportive de Tunis#History because the article is flagged per user @Kowal2701: as LLM content with some copyrights issues. I don't have a firm opinion, but it warrants investigation. Svartner (talk) 22:29, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
|
Tools
[edit]| AI tools |
|---|
General purpose[edit]
Made by the Wikimedia Foundation:
Source verification[edit]
Proofreading / edit checking[edit]
Source search[edit]
Wikidata / SPARQL tooling[edit]
Anti-vandalism / patrolling[edit]
Detection of inconsistencies and errors[edit]
Chatbots / Q&A over Wikipedia[edit]
Content discovery & exploration[edit]
Non-wiki tools that may provide examples or inspiration[edit]
|
In the news
[edit]
|
Previous years news | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
See also
[edit]Encyclopedia proper
[edit]- Artificial intelligence – the Wikipedia article about AI
- Outline of artificial intelligence
- {{Artificial intelligence navbox}}
- {{Artificial intelligence}} (sidebar)
| To display all subcategories click on the "►": |
|---|
Wikimedia
[edit]- m:Artificial intelligence - resources and efforts across Wikimedia projects
- m:AI policies by project - lists AI policies across Wikimedia projects
- c:Commons:AI-generated media - Wikimedia Commons guideline
- m:Research:Implications of ChatGPT for knowledge integrity on Wikipedia - completed research
- m:Wikilegal/Copyright Analysis of ChatGPT - perspective on a legal issue
- Our new AI strategy puts Wikipedia’s humans first - Wikimedia foundation April 2025
- Wikimedia AI - group on Telegram
