Here would be good.
This is the place where his successor really needs to spend an afternoon signing orders to roll back his legacy!
2367 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Nov 2013
@45RPM. You may well be right about ProudBoys, ISIS, and don't forget XR, AntiFa and the rest of the violent absolutist nutjobs across the political spectrum.
But with your choice of list, you indicate tolerance of "violent absolutist nutjobs" as long as they are our "violent absolutist nutjobs". Anyone who holds an opinion you don't like you lump in with "them".
This is the slippery slope that the censors start on.
I mean, you may not like Farage, you may consider his opinions abhorrent - but that does not make them "illegal"
This is the issue. Huawei can afford to invest huge amounts in R&D, and offer sweetheart deals to struggling operators to sell their kit. And supply infinite numbers of on-site engineers to make it go.
All of this requires financial muscle, and the suspicion is that Huawei has essentially an infinite credit line to the Chinese State to achieve this. Even Boeing isn't that well supported.
It's not about being out-competed, but out-subidised.
No, it's affecting us now. Mitsubishi have already thrown in the towel on European car sales, as they can't commit to 100% electric vehicles. So the amount of choice will be going down, and prices will increase, as usually happens when a very small number of companies get to carve up the market between them.
Presumably, like all ERP integrations, making their existing stuff work properly took years more than expected and cost much money and pain.
Now it's stable enough to just get on with their lives.
And SAP want companies to upgrade because "new shiny!" - and because SAP needs the money?
I can see that not aligning with many business plans!
I wonder if there is a legal route to force SAP to maintain the functionality of the product that companies bought. Otherwise, said customers may well be better looking elsewhere.
reCAPTCHA has the same problem that Google Analytics has. Both are free for the web-site operator to use, and they provide useful services (bot prevention and usage stats). But we, the users, pay with our PII. And we didn't agree to help pay for the website like that.
Even the UK Government does it!.
You might be fed up of X11 being old and crusty, but it's all we've got until Wayland is feature-complete. Which it is blatantly not.
Without a working and reliably-deployed UI, the desktop will be owned by Microsoft. Or maybe the point is to ensure that the only way to get a reliable Linux desktop is to buy a RedHat desktop license?
... and you wonder if it's just the usual techy snark.
But only 8100 "completed" deployments out of 15,100? S4/HANA has been around for 5 years, and only just over half of the deployments are live?
Those poor, poor companies that were sold such a massive pup, and are still not able to use the hugely expensive software they paid for.
Went to a motorway service station the other day. Each picnic table has a QR code, and a URL for those of us who are QR-reader-less. I started filling in the web page, when I noticed the "check here to let us send you offers from $(service station operator)" bit at the bottom. I thought the info was supposed to be confidential?
Notice it's mostly for lift-and-shift.
That's because it's really SoftLayer, which was getting old when IBM Borged it - and isn't really "cloud" just VM hosting. Last I looked, the capacity management is utterly pants. There was simply no way to find out if you had enough capacity for a set of VMs that were going to be in the same private network until you create them.
And I bet the random-number billing is no better too.
Because moving the cooling fluid about is only a part of overall cooling costs. I'd suggest that the majority is the heat pumps (i.e., chillers) that expend energy to "push energy uphill" to make the heat-exchangers that cool the coolant with fresh air hotter, and so more effective.
This is why data centres in arctic countries work so well - when the air is sub-zero, you don't need a heat-pump.
I'm not sure about your analysis of Bell Telephone.
You are right that the "crown jewels" of Lucent were allowed to rust away, but something had to be done about the woeful state of the domestic telephone system, which was allowed to stagnate with no competition to force Bell to up it's game. Bell Labs was essentially well-funded by the excessive profits of the Bell monopoly, which hurt everyone else and mostly went in execs pockets anyway.
The result of the Bell breakup didn't stick, as successive US Governments looked away as the Baby Bells were re-combined into Verizon, Sprint, Comcast, etc. Who carefully don't compete at all.