The Problem of Defining Visual Culture in the History of Cultural Studies

Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 8 (1):132-139 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary culture is dominated by visual images, which leads to ‘oculocentrism’ and ‘clip consciousness’. Visual culture is a broad, interdisciplinary field of study. The problem of defining it remains relevant due to the insufficient clarification of the concept of ‘visual’, the lack of a clear distinction from related phenomena and established terminology.The purpose of the study is to explicate the problem of defining visual culture in the history of cultural studies.The historical-comparative and systematic approaches are applied to consider the problem in terminological, historical, theoretical and methodological aspects.The results of the study: it is found that the concept of ‘visual culture’ is as broad as possible, covering artistic works, visual media, everyday practices and images. The evolution of its research field in five stages is characterized: from implicit visual studies of antiquity, through the propedeutic stage to theoretical conceptualization, structuralist orientation and the ‘pictorial’ / ‘iconic turn’. The interdisciplinary nature of visual culture is highlighted. It is noted that visual culture is faced with a lack of methodological clarity and blurred subject matter. The controversy over its disciplinary status and dependence on a limited number of theorists are highlighted.The theoretical significance of the study lies in the explication and systematization of the problem of defining visual culture, clarifying its periodization, which contributes to the understanding of its dynamic nature and the expansion of the categorical apparatus of cultural studies. The practical significance of the study is that understanding the evolution of visual culture allows us to better navigate the oversaturated visual environment, critically reflect on its role in socio-cultural processes and its impact on world perception.The scientific novelty lies in the systematic explication of the problem of defining visual culture through the prism of its historical evolution and the substantiation of five stages of the formation of this field.Prospects for further research include the development of the concept of ‘visual’, the involvement of modern scientific discoveries in the field of vision and the development of research taking into account local languages and traditions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 141,284

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Visual Culture, Art History and the Humanities.Iván Castañeda - 2009 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 8 (1):41-55.
Becoming of subject field of contemporary visual studies.A. M. Tormakhova - 2016 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 9:38-46.
Visual culture: the reader.Jessica Evans & Stuart Hall (eds.) - 1999 - Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications in association with the Open University.
Law, Culture and Visual Studies.Richard K. Sherwin & Anne Wagner (eds.) - 2014 - Dordrecht: Imprint: Springer.
The aesthetic dimension of visual culture.Ondřej Dadejík & Jakub Stejskal (eds.) - 2010 - Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Visual Culture and the Fight for Visibility.Markus Schroer - 2014 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (2):206-228.
Cognitive Abduction in the Study of Visual Culture.María G. Navarro & Noemi de Haro García - 2012 - Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Western and Eastern Studies 2:205-220.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-09-08

Downloads
19 (#1,857,007)

6 months
7 (#1,386,462)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

L'œuvre d'art à l'époque de sa reproduction mécanisée.Walter Benjamin - 1936 - Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 5 (1):40-68.

Add more references