Modern theories of judgment

Philosophical Review 7 (6):583-603 (1898)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2176171

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 141,215

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Some inadequacies of modern theories of judgment.W. H. Sheldon - 1907 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4 (4):94-100.
The relation between Wittgenstein's picture theory of propositions and Russell's theories of judgment.David Pears - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (2):177-196.
Modern Theories of Development. [REVIEW]Ernest Nagel - 1935 - Philosophical Review 44 (2):207-208.
The dualism of mr. P. E. more.Clarissa Rinaker - 1917 - Philosophical Review 26 (4):409-420.
Modern psychology and theories of knowledge.J. E. Creighton - 1894 - Philosophical Review 3 (2):196-200.
Descartes and modern theories of emotion.David Irons - 1895 - Philosophical Review 4 (3):291-302.
AEsthetic Judgment.C. J. Ducasse & D. W. Prall - 1930 - Philosophical Review 39 (3):311.
The Judgment of History.Maurice Mandelbaum - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):302.
Ethical Judgment.John Ladd & Abraham Edel - 1956 - Philosophical Review 65 (4):550.
Judgment and Justification.Lynne Rudder Baker - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (3):481.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
210 (#192,483)

6 months
33 (#257,078)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references