Scorekeeping in a chess game

Semantics and Pragmatics 15 (12) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is an important analogy between languages and games. Just as a scoresheet records features of the evolution of a game to determine the effect of a move in that game, a conversational score records features of the evolution of a conversation to determine the effect of the linguistic moves that speakers make. Chess is particularly interesting for the study of conversational dynamics because it has language-like notations, and so serves as a simplified study in how the effect of an assertion depends on, as well as evolves, the scoreboard. In this paper, we offer a compositional semantics for chess notation and a simple formal picture for determining the full information conveyed by an entry. We will also discuss an alternative model resembling accounts of centered assertion.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Chess is Not a Game.Deborah P. Vossen - 2008 - In Benjamin Hale, Philosophy Looks at Chess. Open Court Press. pp. 191-208.
The reviled art.Stuart Rachels - 2008 - In Benjamin Hale, Philosophy Looks at Chess. Open Court Press.
On the philosophical dimensions of chess.Arto Siitonen - 1998 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):455 – 475.
Chess, Imagination, and Perceptual Understanding.Paul Coates - 2013 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 73:211-242.
Must We Play to Win? A Reply to Morgan.Maksymilian Del Mar - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (2):266-272.
Chess, Games, and Flies.Stefano Franchi - 2005 - Essays in Philosophy 6 (1):85-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-27

Downloads
477 (#110,150)

6 months
28 (#323,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Bryan Pickel
University of Glasgow
Brian Rabern
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Compositionality.Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pure Quotation in Linguistic Context.Brian Rabern - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (2):393-413.
A formal semantics for Wittgenstein's builder language.Brian Rabern - 2025 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 81 (4):1195-1210.
Compositionality.Z. Szab’O. - 1995 - In Edward N. Zalta, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein, Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson, The logic of grammar. Encino, Calif.: Dickenson Pub. Co.. pp. 64-75.
Attitudes de dicto and de se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
Scorekeeping in a language game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359.
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 2013 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton, The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press. pp. 179.

View all 15 references / Add more references