Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be?

Noûs 34 (1):31–55 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is always awkward when someone asks me informally what I’m working on and I answer that I’m trying to figure out what gender is. For outside a rather narrow segment of the academic world, the term ‘gender’ has come to function as the polite way to talk about the sexes. And one thing people feel pretty confident about is their knowledge of the difference between males and females. Males are those human beings with a range of familiar primary and secondary sex characteristics, most important being the penis; females are those with a different set, most important being the vagina or, perhaps, the uterus. Enough said. Against this background, it isn’t clear what could be the point of an inquiry, especially a philosophical inquiry, into “what gender is”.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 141,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
4,385 (#3,421)

6 months
303 (#20,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sally Haslanger
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering.Herman Cappelen - 2018 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Introduction.Herman Cappelen & David Plunkett - 2019 - In Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen & David Plunkett, Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-34.
What is conceptual engineering and what should it be?David J. Chalmers - 2025 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 68 (9):2902-2919.

View all 859 citations / Add more citations