Opinion leaders, independence, and Condorcet's Jury Theorem

Theory and Decision 36 (2):131-162 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Condorcet's Jury Theorem shows that on a dichotomous choice, individuals who all have the same competence above 0.5, can make collective decisions under majority rule with a competence that approaches 1 as either the size of the group or the individual competence goes up. The theorem assumes that the probability of each voter's being correct is independent of the probability of any other voter being correct. Contrary to several authors, the presence of mutual or common influences such as opinion leaders does not easily rule independence either in or out. Indeed, and this ought to be surprising,under certain conditions deference to opinion leaders can improve individual competence without violating independence, and so can raise group competence as well.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-22

Downloads
2,754 (#8,212)

6 months
568 (#4,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Estlund
Brown University

Citations of this work

Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem.Christian List & Robert E. Goodin - 2001 - Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (3):277–306.
Jury Theorems for Peer Review.Marcus Arvan, Liam Kofi Bright & Remco Heesen - 2025 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 76 (2):319-344.
Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma.Philip Pettit - 2001 - Philosophical Issues 11 (1):268-299.
The epistemology of democracy.Elizabeth Anderson - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):8-22.
The Epistemology of Democracy.Elizabeth Anderson - 2006 - Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3 (1):8-22.

View all 88 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 1971 - Oxford,: Harvard University Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
The Theory of Committees and Elections.Duncan Black - 1961 - Philosophy 36 (137):248-249.

Add more references