close

The Register Home Page Image Image

* Posts by JLV

2853 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Mar 2013

Reminder: iPhones commit suicide if you repair them on the cheap

JLV Silver badge
Facepalm

WolfFanBoi much?

Seriously, they do something like that to a product we bought, just so they can gauge us on repairs and you think it's a great idea? Why do you think Apple owners have the rep of being morons here? Precisely because some of us do act like uncritical gullible suckers.

In almost no other product would people make a statement defending a vendor who screws them.

You like OARS so much? Great, you stick with them - your decision, doesn't require bricking my system, does it?

But let me have the choice on my hardware. I just got my MBP fixed by a non-auth dealer and it was a great deal. Fast and cheap swap of a used keyboard & install of an aftermarket SSD. Choice is good, being brainwashed not.

And, for the record, when I got my iphone serviced, I wiped and disconnected my email account beforehand, because that's the only really confidential bit on it. Not using OARS <> stupid.

JLV Silver badge
Joke

>a representative sample of the last week's worth@work

Tssk, tssk, sounds like you had a great Windows week.

Thinks could be much worse...

s/Win7/Win8.1/

JLV Silver badge

Re: Advantages of a cheap phone

Retail insurance is almost always a bad deal and is in aggregate a terrible one. Some retailers make more profit off of it than of their sales.

JLV Silver badge
Mushroom

As an Apple product owner? Totally unacceptable

I like the HW and I like OSX, but I do not like, Apple, the company, much.

The shop downstairs in my building will repair a next-to-last gen iPhone screen for 80-90$ (CAD), 40-50$ on Groupon. They do so in an hour, no waiting.

In fact, screen repairs are one major reason to buy Apple - costs are very competitive and rarely go over $120. Contrast with Android or other phones which typically start @ $200. This isn't out of Apple goodness or anything, I've asked the shops, it's just that there is more volume and less models to deal with with Apple, so better prices.

Living in a big urban center, yes, we do have an Apple store. Far as I know, while you can engage with a Genius (hah!) at the Bar, you need an appointment to do so and they do not repair onsite, your phone has to go away. The price? Not expecting 40-50$, no.

Apple needs to extract its head from its posterior and stop giving people reasons to hate their greedy guts. This control freak-ery was extreme in the old days (<2000), when all the parts were Apple-specific. It gradually got better on their computers after OSX got in, parts were somewhat akin to PC parts, at least in some cases and you could, wonder of wonder, increase RAM and swap disks on YOUR computer. Apple was coming back from near death, had to be nice. Then it starting worsening again.

Now, with glued-in parts, soldered in RAM, cables that essentially have DRM, and now this crap? Hopefully, this is an unforeseen glitch/temporary biz insanity that will be corrected, not future company policy. In which case, I would never buy an iPhone again - it's already not my current phone and would never be again.

In fact, the best outcome, for Apple customers, would be for Apple not to climb down immediately, let this snowball all the way to hell into a major PR disaster and force them to revisit all their most egregious noncompetitive practices in one fell swoop when people finally push back. I think that is fully justified when you brick someone's phone. Won't happen, too many idiots, but still hoping.

Who wants a quad-core 4.2GHz, 64GB, 5TB SSD RAID 10 … laptop?

JLV Silver badge

Re: at $5000

A slightly cheaper approach is to buy a high end gaming laptop.

ASUS has ones that go up to 32GB for example. Count 2-2.5K $. Bought mine specifically to run multiple VMs in. They may not have all the exotica of high end business laptops, but they cost less. And they are infinitely more powerful, with better screens, than normal business or consumer laptops. The graphics oomph is a bit wasted on dev work, but that's OK.

One problem is that you have to replace consumer Windows with Windows Pro. Or put Linux on it.

Software devs' new mantra: Zen dogs dream of small-sized bones

JLV Silver badge
FAIL

"Joe, how's your paycheck?"

"Off by $500"

"Me too. But that's alright. Payroll told me it's IT's ongoing feature experimentation process. It'll be fixed next week "

"They know what they're doing"

Mozilla officially kills Firefox OS for smartphones in favour of 'Connected Devices'

JLV Silver badge
Joke

> we can make the biggest impact in IoT.

Great.

My smart connected lightbulb will now need 1 GB of RAM

: (

Did you know ... Stephen Fry has founded a tech startup?

JLV Silver badge

I would not have made that statement regarding an individual person, but Mr. Fry is a celebrity. As such, you will sometimes get badgered and quite unpleasantly so. That's just the way life is. Some celebrities will struggle with mental illness. Does that mean no one can criticize them, outside of making fun of their mental state?

Regardless of whether Orlowski was "right" or "wrong" in posting this, and previous, articles, it would seem that publicly ignoring it and not responding by calling him "frankly evil" would have been a better idea. That's generally a better coping and avoidance strategy than feeding creatures that live under bridges, especially when you are a public persona.

From the sounds of it, Mr. Fry's main mistake is not to employ a fact checker when doing science coverage. That could be easily remedied. In fact, I think his producers are remiss there. To the public and to Fry. These are not one man shows on a shoestring at the local county fair.

As many have said on this thread, they appreciate his interest in promoting science and he recognizes his own limitations. If he brings the enthusiasm and PR savvy, why not have someone doublecheck before releasing? Everyone comes out ahead.

This feud of theirs seems more silly as we go, but I still find the claim that Orlowski intentionally, or directly, made fun of his illness a stretch.

JLV Silver badge

I would be annoyed at Orlowski if he had indeed made fun of his depression. But an article search, easy to do, by Orlowski author with 'depress' or 'depression' shows nothing Fry-related on the Reg.

Sitting on the fence here. Bong or something more obviously satirical is a better venue than a normally fairly straight-up journalist to really dig at someone who is mostly guilty of a lack of techy acumen. But Mr Fry would probably be better off taking it in stride or ignoring it.

JLV Silver badge
Happy

2 words*

Steve Bong

* or rather, a name

Can't upgrade, won't upgrade: Windows Mobile's user problem

JLV Silver badge

Just wondering...

>Six out of the 10 most popular Windows Phones are two years old.

>Why is this a problem?

Wouldn't that also mean that more recent models aren't being sold much and that sales aren't ramping up? That might be a tad bigger one than just the technicalities around the Windows 10 uptake.

I have no huge beef around MS phones, I briefly considered buying one (a 640 or 740?) as a replacement phone (price == very good, but low res for huge screen). But I wonder when MS is going to drop or fix that product line because it seems to be in zombieland right now.

Whew! How to tell if a DevOps biz is peddling a load of manure

JLV Silver badge

throwing babies out with bathwater?

A good deal of skepticism certainly seems warranted, and I agree with pretty everyone that states that DevOps is not an excuse to shove turds out the door.

But at heart, it is just tools and methods. You can use them responsibly or not, depending on your mindset.

2 things stand out for me:

- automate your server/app/<whatever> builds.

I.e. don't configure by clicking or manually running stuff. Slow, error prone.

But it's not just automate everything via laboriously hand-built shell files. You can use config management tools like Chef that do an amazing lots of things around package and library installation and configuration file scripting.

You can take those install and configuration directives and put them under version control.

The outcome is that, once it's done, you should be able to build a server really quickly, without worrying too much about it. Whether you are brave enough to do so on a production server is one thing, but surely things like resetting a QA server or copying the production environment to a dev server will benefit from less manual intervention.

- have your dev and ops team work together more closely.

That's not necessarily saying let devs anywhere close to production. But breaking down communication barriers and working together on configuration tools will give them a better feel for the moving parts their programs will interact with in prod. Surely not a bad thing either.

Coming from the dev side, using Chef has given me way more insight into Linux system internals than I would have had if I was doing all the configs by hand willy nilly.

But, yes, DevOps is not fully mature yet.

Fail fast, fail often isn't too cool when it means code that hits paying customers or users. In Chef at least, a lot of the ecosystem at least seems to assume you are operating in an freebie/open source-y context: your programs' codelines are coming from open GitHub, so no authentication is needed. Your packages are all an apt-get repo away, without worrying your pretty head about the $50K/server license that the vendor has in mind for his amazing enterprise app. The programs you are using are amazingly all script-configurable, no click-only GUIs to be found. Unicorns are merrily dancing on rainbows.

At heart however, DevOps tools allow configuration automation and versioning and I see that as a benefit if not abused.

JLV Silver badge

IBM Rational ClearCase? Really???

If there was ever a product that did not conform to any notion of stability, usability or simplicity then CC would be it, no? Contrast with git, for example.

I wonder why it's quoted here as anything but as a bad example. Maybe it was meant as part of the 'vendor BS' demos?

And I agree with Lysenko about the production beta bit. It's all fine and dandy for twitter or facebook instances to fall down on their butt and get replaced, hopefully invisibly. Not quite the same when your messy code has been installed on someone else's machines.

DevOps is a great idea, and it can be used to improve quality by speeding up test cycles. Or production web deployments in appropriate cases. But it doesn't really help if the code has shipped/been installed with errors in it - it just makes recovery hopefully somewhat less painful.

Google DeepMind cyber-brain cracks tough AI challenge: Beating a top Go board-game player

JLV Silver badge
Joke

Ah, but...

was it written in Go?

AI pioneer Marvin Minsky dies at 88

JLV Silver badge

Re: Nietzche

Sure about your math? we're at 7 billion, but population was at 1 billion already in 1800, 200 years ago. That's 3 generations and for it to work it implies really really fast growth within generations.

https://www.census.gov/population/international/data/worldpop/table_history.php

But thanks for propagating memes. Given the context, wonder if Minsky would have found its propagation funny.

Terrible infections, bad practices, unclean kit – welcome to hospital IT

JLV Silver badge

>blood type B hackers

Don't misunderstand me.

Health info is about as private as could possibly be, and rightfully so. Blood type access is not at issue and should be as easily accessible as possible. But what about things like STDs, mental disorders and long term illnesses? Disclosure of any of those could result in personal problems and work discrimination (especially in countries where the employer is on the hook for health care).

I just find it odd that confidentiality is so often invoked to explain away health IT failures and then to see this article's findings.

JLV Silver badge
Paris Hilton

This is does not compute

In most countries IT healthcare seems to be some woefully backwards, in terms of patient record storage and connectivity/continuity of healthcare data across providers. The result is a level of duplicate data entry & paper records that would shame any other industry. It ranges from mere inconvenience to wasted millions to serious health risks on prescription abuse or adverse drug interaction.

Despite spending billions on it, of course.

Each and every time, the standard "don't-you-worry-your-pretty-head-about-it" answer is always that us dumb voters fail to understand how seriously the powers that be are about our confidential health data.

p.s. Change password once an hour? Really???? password123003904 => password123003905 much?

Someone please rid me of this turbulent Windows 10 Store

JLV Silver badge
Joke

Re: Search

I fondly remember using Bing searching for "The Guild season 5" right after they left youtube for a Bing Video exclusive gig. For season 5. Big deal for MS (tho extra $$$ killed the show's creativity imho).

No luck. S1 E5. S3 E5. Anything with 5 in title... I don't know if Bing search even had many S5 episodes listed in its search. Though you could see The Guild episodes, just not in any order and mostly earlier ones.

Google sorted it all out (like it had for preceding seasons) and found links for all of S 5 episodes, on Bing, pronto so I could binge :)

Joke icon is for Bing searches, btw. Not my post ;)

Oracle blurts Google's Android secrets in court: You made $22bn using Java, punk

JLV Silver badge

Re: Someone made money w/o giving Lord Larry his dues!

Intolerable!

Me seem to recall Red Hat, having to change their patching procedures a while back because another software company (naming no one, mind you) would just mooch off their patches to maintain their own, "Unbreakable", distribution.

Now, the legality thereof in GPL land is probably on the moochers' side, but when that same company cries grievances to high heaven on usage of a supposedly open sourced language, I find that ironic ;-)

Samsung sued over 'lackadaisical' Android security updates

JLV Silver badge

>security updates for 5 years

Worth considering seriously.

But what about name & shame? Force manufacturers to officially file, for each model, when manufacture has ended as well as the date of their last security update. Then publish the data for all the manufacturers together, allowing easy comparison, and let the public decide. Consumer Reports would have a field day with this.

Methink Samsung might not be so thrilled with their dirty undies being aired out in that case. And how about the unlucky Winphone 7 customers?

Kudos to the Dutch for kicking them in the gonads.

Docker bags unikernel gurus – now you can be just like Linus Torvalds

JLV Silver badge

Sounds like a cool idea if all the kinks and security implications get sorted.

Any idea what order of speedup you would get from an individual application if it didn't have to go through all the kernel communication overhead?

I suppose it highly depends on the application profile, i.e. a network IO bound app, waiting for an external service to respond to a rest/database/rpc call will not gain much. Just like those apps (as opposed to CPU/RAM-bound ones) don't benefit from a massive rewrite in optimized C++ from a Ruby/Python implementation.

But what's best case scenario, for which type of app? Or is the gain more achieved from paring down the "OS" to only the services that the app needs available - in terms of RAM footprint/attack surface?

It's Wikipedia mythbuster time: 8 of the best on your 15th birthday

JLV Silver badge

@ Kristian Walsh Re: There was always a near monopoly on encyclopedic knowledge

Ok, but if your chosen metric is error rate per article, then you also need to consider length of said articles.

Not equating quantity with quality per se, but you would be more likely to encounter errors in a 2-3 page article about a subject than a 2-3 paragraph entry about the same. Unless you are padding, you are just communicating more info, some of which risks being incorrect.

On the other hand, if all you are providing is a rather short entry (which is the way I remember seeing most encyclopedia coverage), then you will generally have to stick to shorter, more generally verifiable information and you would be more likely to not get it wrong.

Taking as an example, your typical historical battle entry*. Wikipedia typically provides date, location, commanding officers, number of participating troops, number of casualties, etc. Then it goes onto into details about what happened, often on at least a page or so in the case of significant battles.

I doubt most Britannica entries would have addressed much more than the date, location and participating armies and generals. Along with a likely much shorter description of the events. Much less to get wrong.

Not defending Wikipedia overmuch, but that 30% overshoot benefits from being put into context as well. I recall seeing other studies stating that Wikipedia and Brittanica were about as (un)reliable each. They're both a quick way to get some hopefully not too inaccurate information about a subject, not fully reliable or authoritative sources.

*

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cannae

http://www.britannica.com/event/Battle-of-Cannae (which would probably be shorter in dead tree format)

JLV Silver badge

>"reader's digest"

Yeah, I call BS.

Sure, there are shortcomings to Wikipedia. But it is unusual for me to read an article about a subject I feel knowledgeable about and catch them out in some unambiguous factual error or omission. It happens, but not that often. I am not sure Britannica would have done that much better in its heydey.

Not saying it is the best thing ever, not saying there aren't any problems. Ideological battlefield articles. People gaming/pranking it. An unfortunate tendency for some people who should be expert in a field to refer to Wikipedia as an authoritative source.

Certainly not unaware that the Reg has a history of getting snarky about them or Jimbo. And there is nothing wrong with knocking over some clay-hoofed sacred cows.

But straight out "Reader's Digest" in general? Methink you are jumping on bandwagon & puffing your own supposed wisdom up. But enlighten us by all means with some examples.

JLV Silver badge

>why you're increasingly being cold called by creeps...

Smells like FUD to me as well.

Doesn't happen to me and I use Google quite a bit.

What I don't do however is have very much personally identifiable profile info online, I am pretty anal retentive about that, extending to requesting folks to untag my pics on FB, for example. So while I do get telemarketing calls, they seem more from random autodialing than anything else.

This whole thing about Google selling on info makes little sense, for two reasons. First, it's a question of trust. Many of us already don't trust them much, why make it worse by carrying on nefarious business and getting caught? They'd have to be Lenovo braindead to do that and risk killing the golden goose. Especially with Google mail.

Second and more importantly. They have set themselves up to be a middleman in all the ads and they benefit massively from it. And, yes, they do so because they know so much about you and, yes, I get that makes many uncomfortable. However, their power, which they can use (or abuse) at leisure, is precisely because they are the necessary middleman. If they sell any information to anyone else, they lose that privileged position and control over that info. So they specifically have a profit incentive NOT to do what you are claiming they do.

Not for altruistic or idealistic reasons. Merely to keep the profits for themselves. Which, at least in my book, makes it relatively simple to gauge what to expect from them.

Eight-billion-dollar Irish tax bill looms over Apple

JLV Silver badge

Re: Actually there will be ZERO cost for Apple to pass on

Problem is the US has unusually high corp taxes but ample loopholes to avoid paying them. Lower, fully collected, non-avoidable rates would serve everyone better, except tax lawyers and accountants. And where would the world be without those 2 fine professions, I ask you? Not to mention putting all the (justifiably) outraged social justice crusaders outta work as well.

Article missing crucial bit: 8B is Europe-wide tax liability or Ireland-only? Seeing as many game Ireland tax residency.

Aircraft now so automated pilots have forgotten how to fly

JLV Silver badge
Joke

JU-52s

Ah, so the Germans are going for world domination again?

They pulled the old Ju-52 trick in the 1930s already, pretending they were running airliners rather than dodging the Versailles Treaty.

Come to think of it, did you mean Lufthansa or Luftwaffe? "Long haul fleet" & Luftwaffe sounds a bit odd. I know, confusingly similar names and that's all part of the plan.

p.s. don't mention the war!

2015 was the Year of the Linux Phone ... Nah, we're messing with you

JLV Silver badge

moped

In Neal Stephenson's "In the beginning was the command line" (http://www.cryptonomicon.com/beginning.html) essay, circa 2000:

Linux is an M1 tank coming in a free DYI kit. Bit hard to drive, but powerful.

Mac OS - the horrendously crappy 8.x or 9.x series, and any Apple user who doesn't think it was pants by 1999 is truly deserving of being called a fanboi - was a Vespa. Cool looking but crap.

Windows is a station wagon, IIRC. (Insert joke about Lada making station wagons?)

Unlike Neal's latter literary efforts, he more or less manages to get the point across without rambling on about the impact that the mating habits of arctic reindeers had on the dissemination of the printing press in Outer Mongolia or whatsuch.

JLV Silver badge
Flame

Re: Remind us again...

>figure for BSD

That including OSX, just like we are counting Android for overall Linux? ;-)

p.s. I feel the need to add a flame icon, as I fully expect outraged whateveristas to punish me for my impudence :(

JLV Silver badge

Re: Linux gaming

Agreed, but this brings me to a question related to consumer commercial application availability on Linux. I haven't used Linux as a desktop for a while now, so quite of touch, please forgive.

(I understand that you can perfectly run for-pay enterprise applications like Oracle on Linux, that's not what I am asking about).

Before Steam and this development, there had been few games on Linux. Loki comes to mind, but that didn't go so well for them. And a lot of the games for Linux were of the free/GNU type and that doesn't always work well for a game publisher who is in it for money.

So now we have Steam for games. But say you were willing to pony up good money for a commercial non-game desktop program. Let's take a Photoshop/Gimp alternative. Or a Quickbooks-alike. Where would you buy them? Is anyone publishing non-free programs for consumers for Linux and making money at it? What are their distribution channels? Not asking about drivers, mind you.

I know some of you folks really dislike proprietary programs on principle. That's fine, that's your choice and this question is not aimed at you, nor is it intended to criticize Linux/GNU/GPL. In fact, free software is what makes apt-get and yum repos so good at keeping your system updated.

But for those who want to run Linux and purchase commercial programs, like the Steam users can nowadays, what are the options? Is there much demand (the free stuff is often fairly good, outside of games)?

JLV Silver badge

>Manufacturers provide drivers for Windows/Mac

Only partially true for Macs. I'd still research compatibility in some cases, especially with stuff like scanners.

Things might have changed in the last 3-4 years but when I last bought a scanner (Fujitsu 1500 Scansnap, lovely gear, works fine on Macs) there were still gaps in Mac scanner support for some other manufacturers. Don't let the I-got-it-working blurbs on forums fool you, some of these things will not work easily, if at all. Of course, chances they won't work with Linux either.

JLV Silver badge
Linux

Re: Moving on up!

Well, one thing for sure. If you are looking at cloud/vm stuff, the easy entry point is most often Linux. And then mostly CentOS & Ubuntu.

The BSDs are, surprisingly, very absent. OSX is, unsurprisingly, missing.

But, mostly, who wants to dig around for a Windows license/disk, unless they have a site-wide license for it? Commercial licenses and VMs are just not a great match, for hobbyists and many others. This is something MS should be way more wary of (same applies to Oracle vs Postgres).

I also appreciate how seamlessly I can switch from bash on my mac to bash on linux via ssh. Again something MS should be wary of, despite Powershell getting some good reviews.

So, no, not a bad year.

Nest thermostat owners out in the cold after software update cockup

JLV Silver badge

Re: the internet isn't the problem

Actually, that is a good question. What about reverting to the immediately preceding release instead? A lot of the Chef-based devops deployment cookbooks I have been looking at are based on delivering a codeline (for the actual application code, not the ancillary services) that gets stored in a directory, along with preceding codelines using a hash/incremental naming scheme. To activate that codeline, you just point "current" to it via symlink and the rest of VM only refers to "current" to run the application.

Many actual cloud-y VM implementations don't so much do that as drop the VM and rebuild a new one with the new codeline, even though this mechanism is in place. Easier. In IoT land, however, you can't just nuke the device. But, at the cost of doubling storage requirements, you could implement a fallback-to-previous scheme.

And, I would submit that the internet (culture) IS the problem here. Nest had a presumably stable product until they iterated it once too many times and got to a failed state. But a physical thermostat is not a cloud VM you can easily drop and replace. It requires a different state of mind in terms of management (avoiding bricking), security and user control. Ultimately it means acknowledging that its continued good operation is somewhat more important to the user than a cloud FarmVille or Twitter clone having six sigma uptime.

On the positive side, at least we are seeing a culture that should encourage fixing bugs in embedded software.

JLV Silver badge
Happy

A solution in search of a problem has found one, apparently.

Learn you Func Prog on five minute quick!

JLV Silver badge

>Real programmers, (like me),

There's OO and OO.

The original Design Patterns book was the first book I read where the intent, and advantages of, proper object design came through. It requires a fair bit of attention to get it, but it sure doesn't talk down to you and it sounds very little like your critique.

Most OO books do not so much sin the way you claim, they sin by immediately focusing on inheritance, because... well, it is easy to explain. Never mind that inheritance is only one facet, and often the least useful, of OO. There's also often a tradeoff: some things like dynamically composing objects together at runtime are extremely powerful and hard to do procedurally, but also make debugging exponentially harder.

And most intro to Java books also sin by assuming that, since you don't know the One True Language (TM), then you don't know objects either so they must launch in an OO intro.

On the other hand, as an example of less than useful gratuitous object orientation, read this little nugget.

http://csis.pace.edu/~bergin/patterns/ppoop.html

Start out with a simple hack (on top) and go down to the author's brilliant suggestion at end. All other things remaining equal, which bit of code would you be rather looking at 2 AM with an angry customer on the line?

Notice the .edu in the above url, maybe that's where all those pants uni programmers come from ;-)

VW floats catalytic converter as fix for fibbing diesels

JLV Silver badge

>Biodiesel is significantly cleaner than Petrol. Straight vegetable oil is just as good

Recycling cooking oil is fine as a way to power some vehicles, but please do the math.

I refill my (petrol/gas) car about every 4 weeks, with a 40 liter top up on average. Do you really really think that the average persons eats anywhere near the amount of chips per month to generate 40 liters of gas-equivalent recycled biodiesel? Even the Spanish, who advocate a rather heroic use of olive oil, would find it hard to have that much cooking oil around. Your idea just doesn't scale up to most vehicles.

As far as taking vegetable oil straight from production (once you ran out of cooking oil to recycle), you still have to grow the stuff. Which takes ample land, fertilizers and energy. If the process is anything like our glorious ethanol endeavors the main thing that would achieve is more $ to the lucky farmers and higher food prices, rather than any CO2 reduction.

Global warming may be an issue, but, by themselves, good intentions and wishful thinking around romantic ideas aren't a solution. You need to get something that makes sense economically (even assuming increased carbon taxes) and that can be scaled up.

Smartphone hard, dudes, like it’s the end of the world!

JLV Silver badge

impressive memory!

Oooooh, Dabbsy, you really impress me with the paaaartays.

And especially you and your mates' ability to remember all of each others' numbers on your new disposable SIMs. No doubt while under the influence of bacteria excrement metabolites.

I will have another beer and see if it helps me remember my own phone number without looking it up.

:) 16 all

Plain cruelty: Boffins flay Linux ransomware for the third time

JLV Silver badge
Paris Hilton

Just wondering...

You have to wonder why, for an article on Linux malware, so many people are slagging Windows in passing.

Which well deserves slagging, and provides ample opportunity to do so on a pretty steady basis. But Windows is not at all involved in this little story. Even the bit about the open source software being so awesome seems strange... surely the malware isn't sitting on github waiting to be taken apart? Seems to me the same competent efforts by the white hats to nix the encryption could have taken place in the, vastly more likely, event of a Windows-based malware.

Does go to show that you can't rely on an OS, even a fairly secure one, to totally mitigate badly written applications and/or incompetent users or admins. And that, as usual, we can't collectively step out of our partisanship.

Was Android moving to OpenJDK really a Google gift to devs?

JLV Silver badge
Thumb Up

Funny how we both used 'steaming turd' for J2ME. I hadn't read your post yet when I wrote mine ;-). +1

JLV Silver badge

Re: Google could have avoided Java wholly...

First, language, not OS.

Second, the spiel (not the reality) around Java has always been about standards and open-ness. I don't think it was unreasonable from Google not to invent another language, nor the OS, in its mobile venture.

Thing is, calling J2ME a useless steaming turd is an insult to turds and Oracle got miffed that someone else got Java on mobile better. And probably also thought they could grab some $$$. This is all a result of Sun and Oracle's openness/control schizoism wrt their "open" language. Which has been going on since forever (remember the Java cert/compatibility tests being non-free to keep control of the "free" language).

Now we have some nitwit judge granting IP protection to APIs.

Oracle should have embraced Android as finally making Java relevant on mobile instead of this lawyer-enriching mess. If SUN had been better at making money off Java, and their other software, there'd be less incentive now for these shenanigans (and maybe they'd still be around).

Obama: What will solve America's gun problem? What could it be? *snaps fingers* Technology!

JLV Silver badge

Re: Ammunition

With all respect for the various viewpoints that go into gun politics and also with respect to the founding fathers and the Constitution, but I find it disturbing that such a high proportion of NRA advocates use "resistance to the lawfully elected government" as a justification for gun ownership. That's a whole different ballpark than "shoot a burglar endangering my family", IMHO.

I mean, many people in Western countries seem dissatisfied with our governments and our politicians. That doesn't mean many people, in countries other than the US, distrust them to the point where we think it necessary to hold weapons for potential armed resistance. That's what elections are for, and the US Constitution has ample, perhaps even excessive, checks and balances built into it to prevent excessive power concentration by any of the 3 branches.

Do some of you distrust your government that much? Your own soldiers? You know, the guys that did the dying on your behalf in the last decade or so. But yet the Republican right generally tends to view catchall anti-terrorist and surveillance laws in a benign fashion and excoriated Snowden?

'sides, as you point out, the balance of power is way on the Federal side anyway. Not to mention that, in any contest between a group of individuals and a competent military, the military's training and unit-level tactics should easily overcome individual skill, even at weapon parity level.

JLV Silver badge

>Is it really so frequent an event?

A long, long time ago, Time Magazine ran an article covering 1 day's worth of guns deaths.

http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/01/16/a-history-of-violence-gun-control-in-the-pages-of-time/slide/july-1989-death-by-gun/

IIRC, it went something like this:

72 deaths - total. Due to accidents, suicides, criminals killing someone, suicide, murder of acquaintances, etc... And self-defense.

4 (out of 72) - number of deaths where criminals were killed by citizens defending themselves. Even assuming those self-defense kills were all justified, the numbers did not really point to guns improving things much.

I really can't see Time ever doing this again. Too hot a topic.

Obama is doing what he can, which is to say, not much. Biometrics are not a bad idea, if they can be made to work, but most of the recent mass shootings have been carried out by the rightful owners of the firearms AFAIK.

Activist investors want tepid Yahoo! to reboot crashed Marissa Mayer

JLV Silver badge

but... but...

All of this was supposed to be fixed by removing all those pesky remote workers who sap productivity and morale. Whatever happened, Mrs. M.?

To be fair, not sure what can be done at this point, or several years back already. A quick glance at their homepage, which I hadn't visited for years, and I find it looks very much like a 2010-vintage trashy 'news' site.

I don't think they can even get $ from outbrain, taboola or the like, because their main page already looks like it was composed by those fine fellows. Even has a sponsored story for "speeding up your slow computer".

I think the investors should have really pushed back a few years back when its founder nixed a selloff. Now the horse isn't so much out the door as over the cliff a few miles away and well covered with flies. Not sure Mrs Mayer could have done any better (or worse). After all, Alta Vista got put out of biz by Google et all and it was, IMHO, a much better resource than yahoo ever was for finding things.

iOS 9 kludged our iPhones, now give us money, claims new lawsuit

JLV Silver badge

Re: iPad 2 and iPhone 4S work perfectly with iOS 9.x

>anyone telling otherwise is lying.

Two other people have already made that point*. More politely.

Insulting people without knowing the whole story does remarkably little to convince others that your analysis of a product is based on sound judgment, rather than your prejudices, be they positive or negative. I suspect that at least some Apple users cringe at comments like these, just like savvy Linux users do not particularly want to be associated with folks like our dear departed Eadon. Since you are calling me a liar, I will happily call you an a.+hole.

* dunno, maybe a factory reset and reinstall would help. Something's certainly different on my tablet and it's not from running many apps either. Thanks (to the other posters) for this info.

JLV Silver badge

Wish this had been publicized before

iPad 4 here. Post 9.x, the poor thing is limping along. This is after going through all the settings and making sure that all the bling animations & stuff is off. Chrome is especially liable to get shut down (probably due to insufficient memory).

Vaunted tech like the ad-blocking? Only on Safari and only on iPad Air 1+ (i.e. the generation after my 3 year old kit). So, 9 basically slows down the whole thing to molasses but all its spiffy new features are hardware-locked to newer kit.

The reviews by the press did nada to identify this. The fanbois who took a look did not either.

Not upgrading is not a satisfactory answer - lots (all?) of apps stop issuing updates on older iOS.

I appreciate Apple's support for older devices, I really do. In the sense that many other phone OS, or the manufacturers, provide a very low bar to improve on. But Apple needs to get better at trimming back guzzle-guzzle processes on their older kit. Otherwise even fanbois will get annoyed enough to go elsewhere. Hopefully this lawsuit, if well publicized, will get them to be more sensitive.

And the professional press really needs to get its thumb out of their nethers, flag the bad along with the good and write more informative reviews. Not just gush stupidly about the tech on their latest-gen bling. To start with, how about bitching more loudly that most new flagship phones, not just Apple's, are now @ $800+. For a phone???

p.s. too bad about Blackberry because my fairly low spec Classic just zips along happily on BB 10.3. You wouldn't know from looking at its responsiveness that its guts are really pretty outdated chipsets.

Forget anonymity, we can remember you wholesale with machine intel, hackers warned

JLV Silver badge

given the subject, this brings to mind a short story by PKD (can't recall the title) where a robot investigates a murder scene and gradually narrows down the possible culprits by trawling a database of characteristics for the population vs evidence it finds at the scene. I believe that it turns out that the whole evidence set was being gamed from the start.

It's amazing the UK Parliament agreed to track 22bn Brits' car trips. Oh right – it didn't

JLV Silver badge
Headmaster

"22bn Brits' car trips"

Wow, you folks have been busy. 22 of youse around nowadays?

Maybe "Brits' 22bn car trips", eh?

US Marines kill noisy BigDog robo-mule for blowing their cover

JLV Silver badge
Headmaster

Re: "Warfighter"?

'warrior' or 'soldier' would work fine, if the word in question was actually 'warfighter'. But the OP got that wrong, the article talks about the 'Warfighting Lab' which implies that it is the activity that is being studied, not those doing the work.

If it was indeed 'warfighter', then, yeah, that would be a pretty useless & gratuitous synonym for 'warrior'. But it wasn't that in the article itself. That's why I am unaware of an existing word with same meaning.

Grammar pedant icon is surely warranted by now.

JLV Silver badge

Re: So use it for deception..

$32m is actually a pretty low score for a failed weapon system. The US taxpayer can usually be milked for more, a lobbyist won't be getting his xmas bonus for this one.

Witness the Sgt York spaa. Or the biggest of them all, the F35.

JLV Silver badge

Re: "Warfighter"?

As a person for whom English is a second language chronologically, but is now my primary, I'd say that one of its strengths is the capacity to bolt words together to make new ones (German does that as well, but is ... German, with weird grammar). That and absorb foreign words.

Some of these words won't survive. Some shouldn't have (proactive). But many enrich the language and keep it vibrant. Counter-example? French, which has the Academie Francaise nanny and took decades to pontificate a translation for email.

Warfighting? In the usage context, what would be a better synonym? Not overly defending it, but it doesn't seem totally ridiculous either. War waging is the closest I see.

Baby & bathwater. Can't have lots of new words without without a fair share of misses. Personally, more annoyed at the dreck of social media words that end up in the official dictionaries each year.

Microsoft in 2015: Mobile disasters, Windows 10 and heads in the clouds

JLV Silver badge

Re: The game is up Microsoft - your code is crap!

Don't be daft. Apple, with several failed attempts at rolling a successor to OS 9, really didn't have much of a choice but a desperate gamble on BSD. Which, incidentally, has no GPL "show your source code" requirements. Neither condition applies to your little fantasy.

No disrespect to Linux intended. It has shown its value many times over. Linux on Azure? That makes sense, for those who want Azure. More interop? Great!

Windows on Linux? Via Wine 8-/ ? Why?

'sides, monoculture are rarely a good thing. Linux and users benefits from the competition.